4👑☸ Cattāri Ariya-saccaṃ 四聖諦

4👑☸MN‍MN 105    🔝


detailed TOC



MN 105 Sunakkhatta

with Sunakkhatta


(derived from B. Sujato 2018/12)
Evaṃ me sutaṃ—​
So I have heard.
ekaṃ samayaṃ bhagavā vesāliyaṃ viharati mahāvane kūṭāgārasālāyaṃ.
At one time the Buddha was staying near Vesālī, at the Great Wood, in the hall with the peaked roof.
Tena kho pana samayena sambahulehi bhikkhūhi bhagavato santike aññā byākatā hoti:
Now at that time several monks had declared their enlightenment in the Buddha’s presence:
“‘khīṇā jāti, vusitaṃ brahmacariyaṃ, kataṃ karaṇīyaṃ, nāparaṃ itthattāyā’ti pajānāmā”ti.
“We understand: ‘Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed, what had to be done has been done, there is no return to any state of existence.’”
Assosi kho sunakkhatto licchaviputto:
Sunakkhatta the Licchavi heard about this.
“sambahulehi kira bhikkhūhi bhagavato santike aññā byākatā hoti:
‘khīṇā jāti, vusitaṃ brahmacariyaṃ, kataṃ karaṇīyaṃ, nāparaṃ itthattāyāti pajānāmā’”ti.
Atha kho sunakkhatto licchaviputto yena bhagavā tenupasaṅkami; upasaṅkamitvā bhagavantaṃ abhivādetvā ekamantaṃ nisīdi. Ekamantaṃ nisinno kho sunakkhatto licchaviputto bhagavantaṃ etadavoca:
He went to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and said to him:
“sutaṃ metaṃ, bhante:
“Sir, I have heard that
‘sambahulehi kira bhikkhūhi bhagavato santike aññā byākatā—
several monks have declared their enlightenment in the Buddha’s presence.
khīṇā jāti, vusitaṃ brahmacariyaṃ, kataṃ karaṇīyaṃ, nāparaṃ itthattāyāti pajānāmā’ti.
Ye te, bhante, bhikkhū bhagavato santike aññaṃ byākaṃsu:
‘khīṇā jāti, vusitaṃ brahmacariyaṃ, kataṃ karaṇīyaṃ, nāparaṃ itthattāyāti pajānāmā’ti, kacci te, bhante, bhikkhū sammadeva aññaṃ byākaṃsu udāhu santetthekacce bhikkhū adhimānena aññaṃ byākaṃsū”ti?
I trust they did so rightly—or are there some who declared enlightenment out of overestimation?”
“Ye te, sunakkhatta, bhikkhū mama santike aññaṃ byākaṃsu:
‘khīṇā jāti, vusitaṃ brahmacariyaṃ, kataṃ karaṇīyaṃ, nāparaṃ itthattāyāti pajānāmā’ti.
Santetthekacce bhikkhū sammadeva aññaṃ byākaṃsu, santi panidhekacce bhikkhū adhimānenapi aññaṃ byākaṃsu.
“Some of them did so rightly, Sunakkhatta, while others did so out of overestimation.
Tatra, sunakkhatta, ye te bhikkhū sammadeva aññaṃ byākaṃsu tesaṃ taṃ tatheva hoti;
Now, when monks declare enlightenment rightly, that’s how it is for them.
ye pana te bhikkhū adhimānena aññaṃ byākaṃsu tatra, sunakkhatta, tathāgatassa evaṃ hoti:
But when monks declare enlightenment out of overestimation, the Realized One thinks:
‘dhammaṃ nesaṃ desessan’ti.
‘I should teach them the Dhamma.’
Evañcettha, sunakkhatta, tathāgatassa hoti:
If the Realized One thinks
‘dhammaṃ nesaṃ desessan’ti.
he should teach them the Dhamma,
Atha ca panidhekacce moghapurisā pañhaṃ abhisaṅkharitvā abhisaṅkharitvā tathāgataṃ upasaṅkamitvā pucchanti.
but then certain foolish men, having carefully planned a question, approach the Realized One and ask it,
Tatra, sunakkhatta, yampi tathāgatassa evaṃ hoti:
then the Realized One
‘dhammaṃ nesaṃ desessan’ti tassapi hoti aññathattan”ti.
changes his mind.”
“Etassa bhagavā kālo, etassa sugata kālo,
“Now is the time, Blessed One! Now is the time, Holy One!
yaṃ bhagavā dhammaṃ deseyya. Bhagavato sutvā bhikkhū dhāressantī”ti.
Let the Buddha teach the Dhamma. The monks will listen and remember it.”
“Tena hi, sunakkhatta, suṇāhi, sādhukaṃ manasi karohi; bhāsissāmī”ti.
“Well then, Sunakkhatta, listen and pay close attention, I will speak.”
“Evaṃ, bhante”ti kho sunakkhatto licchaviputto bhagavato paccassosi.
“Yes, sir,” replied Sunakkhatta.
Bhagavā etadavoca—
The Buddha said this:
Pañca kho ime, sunakkhatta, kāmaguṇā.
“Sunakkhatta, there are these five kinds of sensual stimulation.
Katame pañca?
What five?
Cakkhuviññeyyā rūpā iṭṭhā kantā manāpā piyarūpā kāmūpasaṃhitā rajanīyā,
Sights known by the eye that are likable, desirable, agreeable, pleasant, sensual, and arousing.
sotaviññeyyā saddā … pe …
Sounds known by the ear …
ghānaviññeyyā gandhā …
Smells known by the nose …
jivhāviññeyyā rasā …
Tastes known by the tongue …
kāyaviññeyyā phoṭṭhabbā iṭṭhā kantā manāpā piyarūpā kāmūpasaṃhitā rajanīyā—
Touches known by the body that are likable, desirable, agreeable, pleasant, sensual, and arousing.
ime kho, sunakkhatta, pañca kāmaguṇā.
These are the five kinds of sensual stimulation.
Ṭhānaṃ kho panetaṃ, sunakkhatta, vijjati yaṃ idhekacco purisapuggalo lokāmisādhimutto assa.
It’s possible that a certain individual may be intent on carnal pleasures.
Lokāmisādhimuttassa kho, sunakkhatta, purisapuggalassa tappatirūpī ceva kathā saṇṭhāti, tadanudhammañca anuvitakketi, anuvicāreti, tañca purisaṃ bhajati, tena ca vittiṃ āpajjati;
Such an individual engages in pertinent conversation, thinking and considering in line with that. They associate with that kind of person, and they find it satisfying.
āneñjapaṭisaṃyuttāya ca pana kathāya kacchamānāya na sussūsati, na sotaṃ odahati, na aññā cittaṃ upaṭṭhāpeti, na ca taṃ purisaṃ bhajati, na ca tena vittiṃ āpajjati.
But when talk connected with the imperturbable is going on they don’t want to listen. They don’t lend an ear or apply their minds to understand it. They don’t associate with that kind of person, and they don’t find it satisfying.
Seyyathāpi, sunakkhatta, puriso sakamhā gāmā vā nigamā vā ciravippavuttho assa.
Suppose a person had left their own village or town long ago,
So aññataraṃ purisaṃ passeyya tamhā gāmā vā nigamā vā acirapakkantaṃ.
and they saw another person who had only recently left there.
So taṃ purisaṃ tassa gāmassa vā nigamassa vā khematañca subhikkhatañca appābādhatañca puccheyya;
They would ask about whether their village was safe, with plenty of food and little disease,
tassa so puriso tassa gāmassa vā nigamassa vā khematañca subhikkhatañca appābādhatañca saṃseyya.
and the other person would tell them the news.
Taṃ kiṃ maññasi, sunakkhatta,
What do you think, Sunakkhatta?
api nu so puriso tassa purisassa sussūseyya, sotaṃ odaheyya, aññā cittaṃ upaṭṭhāpeyya, tañca purisaṃ bhajeyya, tena ca vittiṃ āpajjeyyā”ti?
Would that person want to listen to that other person? Would they lend an ear and apply their minds to understand? Would they associate with that person, and find it satisfying?”
“Evaṃ, bhante”.
“Yes, sir.”
“Evameva kho, sunakkhatta, ṭhānametaṃ vijjati yaṃ idhekacco purisapuggalo lokāmisādhimutto assa.
“In the same way, it’s possible that a certain individual may be intent on carnal pleasures.
Lokāmisādhimuttassa kho, sunakkhatta, purisapuggalassa tappatirūpī ceva kathā saṇṭhāti, tadanudhammañca anuvitakketi, anuvicāreti, tañca purisaṃ bhajati, tena ca vittiṃ āpajjati;
Such an individual engages in pertinent conversation, thinking and considering in line with that. They associate with that kind of person, and they find it satisfying.
āneñjapaṭisaṃyuttāya ca pana kathāya kacchamānāya na sussūsati, na sotaṃ odahati, na aññā cittaṃ upaṭṭhāpeti, na ca taṃ purisaṃ bhajati, na ca tena vittiṃ āpajjati.
But when talk connected with the imperturbable is going on they don’t want to listen. They don’t lend an ear or apply their minds to understand it. They don’t associate with that kind of person, and they don’t find it satisfying.
So evamassa veditabbo:
You should know of them:
‘āneñjasaṃyojanena hi kho visaṃyutto lokāmisādhimutto purisapuggalo’ti.
‘That individual is intent on carnal pleasures, for they’re detached from things connected with the imperturbable.’
Ṭhānaṃ kho panetaṃ, sunakkhatta, vijjati yaṃ idhekacco purisapuggalo āneñjādhimutto assa.
It’s possible that a certain individual may be intent on the imperturbable.
Āneñjādhimuttassa kho, sunakkhatta, purisapuggalassa tappatirūpī ceva kathā saṇṭhāti, tadanudhammañca anuvitakketi, anuvicāreti, tañca purisaṃ bhajati, tena ca vittiṃ āpajjati;
Such an individual engages in pertinent conversation, thinking and considering in line with that. They associate with that kind of person, and they find it satisfying.
lokāmisapaṭisaṃyuttāya ca pana kathāya kacchamānāya na sussūsati, na sotaṃ odahati, na aññā cittaṃ upaṭṭhāpeti, na ca taṃ purisaṃ bhajati, na ca tena vittiṃ āpajjati.
But when talk connected with carnal pleasures is going on they don’t want to listen. They don’t lend an ear or apply their minds to understand it. They don’t associate with that kind of person, and they don’t find it satisfying.
Seyyathāpi, sunakkhatta, paṇḍupalāso bandhanā pavutto abhabbo haritattāya;
Suppose there was a fallen, withered leaf. It’s incapable of becoming green again.
evameva kho, sunakkhatta, āneñjādhimuttassa purisapuggalassa ye lokāmisasaṃyojane se pavutte.
In the same way, an individual intent on the imperturbable has dropped the connection with carnal pleasures.
So evamassa veditabbo:
You should know of them:
‘lokāmisasaṃyojanena hi kho visaṃyutto āneñjādhimutto purisapuggalo’ti.
‘That individual is intent on the imperturbable, for they’re detached from things connected with carnal pleasures.’
Ṭhānaṃ kho panetaṃ, sunakkhatta, vijjati yaṃ idhekacco purisapuggalo ākiñcaññāyatanādhimutto assa.
It’s possible that a certain individual may be intent on the dimension of nothingness.
Ākiñcaññāyatanādhimuttassa kho, sunakkhatta, purisapuggalassa tappatirūpī ceva kathā saṇṭhāti, tadanudhammañca anuvitakketi, anuvicāreti, tañca purisaṃ bhajati, tena ca vittiṃ āpajjati;
Such an individual engages in pertinent conversation, thinking and considering in line with that. They associate with that kind of person, and they find it satisfying.
āneñjapaṭisaṃyuttāya ca pana kathāya kacchamānāya na sussūsati, na sotaṃ odahati, na aññā cittaṃ upaṭṭhāpeti, na ca taṃ purisaṃ bhajati, na ca tena vittiṃ āpajjati.
But when talk connected with the imperturbable is going on they don’t want to listen. They don’t lend an ear or apply their minds to understand it. They don’t associate with that kind of person, and they don’t find it satisfying.
Seyyathāpi, sunakkhatta, puthusilā dvedhābhinnā appaṭisandhikā hoti;
Suppose there was a broad rock that had been broken in half, so that it could not be put back together again.
evameva kho, sunakkhatta, ākiñcaññāyatanādhimuttassa purisapuggalassa ye āneñjasaṃyojane se bhinne.
In the same way, an individual intent on the dimension of nothingness has broken the connection with the imperturbable.
So evamassa veditabbo:
You should know of them:
‘āneñjasaṃyojanena hi kho visaṃyutto ākiñcaññāyatanādhimutto purisapuggalo’ti.
‘That individual is intent on the dimension of nothingness, for they’re detached from things connected with the imperturbable.’
Ṭhānaṃ kho panetaṃ, sunakkhatta, vijjati yaṃ idhekacco purisapuggalo nevasaññānāsaññāyatanādhimutto assa.
It’s possible that a certain individual may be intent on the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception.
Nevasaññānāsaññāyatanādhimuttassa kho, sunakkhatta, purisapuggalassa tappatirūpī ceva kathā saṇṭhāti, tadanudhammañca anuvitakketi, anuvicāreti, tañca purisaṃ bhajati, tena ca vittiṃ āpajjati;
Such an individual engages in pertinent conversation, thinking and considering in line with that. They associate with that kind of person, and they find it satisfying.
ākiñcaññāyatanapaṭisaṃyuttāya ca pana kathāya kacchamānāya na sussūsati, na sotaṃ odahati, na aññā cittaṃ upaṭṭhāpeti, na ca taṃ purisaṃ bhajati, na ca tena vittiṃ āpajjati.
But when talk connected with the dimension of nothingness is going on they don’t want to listen. They don’t lend an ear or apply their minds to understand it. They don’t associate with that kind of person, and they don’t find it satisfying.
Seyyathāpi, sunakkhatta, puriso manuññabhojanaṃ bhuttāvī chaḍḍeyya.
Suppose someone had eaten some delectable food and thrown it up.
Taṃ kiṃ maññasi, sunakkhatta,
What do you think, Sunakkhatta?
api nu tassa purisassa tasmiṃ bhatte puna bhottukamyatā assā”ti?
Would that person want to eat that food again?”
“No hetaṃ, bhante”.
“No, sir.
“Taṃ kissa hetu”?
Why is that?
“Aduñhi, bhante, bhattaṃ paṭikūlasammatan”ti.
Because that food is considered repulsive.”
“Evameva kho, sunakkhatta, nevasaññānāsaññāyatanādhimuttassa purisapuggalassa ye ākiñcaññāyatanasaṃyojane se vante.
“In the same way, an individual intent on the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception has vomited the connection with the dimension of nothingness.
So evamassa veditabbo:
You should know of them:
‘ākiñcaññāyatanasaṃyojanena hi kho visaṃyutto nevasaññānāsaññāyatanādhimutto purisapuggalo’ti.
‘That individual is intent on the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception, for they’re detached from things connected with the dimension of nothingness.’
Ṭhānaṃ kho panetaṃ, sunakkhatta, vijjati yaṃ idhekacco purisapuggalo sammā nibbānādhimutto assa.
It’s possible that a certain individual may be rightly intent on nirvana.
Sammā nibbānādhimuttassa kho, sunakkhatta, purisapuggalassa tappatirūpī ceva kathā saṇṭhāti, tadanudhammañca anuvitakketi, anuvicāreti, tañca purisaṃ bhajati, tena ca vittiṃ āpajjati;
Such an individual engages in pertinent conversation, thinking and considering in line with that. They associate with that kind of person, and they find it satisfying.
nevasaññānāsaññāyatanapaṭisaṃyuttāya ca pana kathāya kacchamānāya na sussūsati, na sotaṃ odahati, na aññā cittaṃ upaṭṭhāpeti, na ca taṃ purisaṃ bhajati, na ca tena vittiṃ āpajjati.
But when talk connected with the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception is going on they don’t want to listen. They don’t lend an ear or apply their minds to understand it. They don’t associate with that kind of person, and they don’t find it satisfying.
Seyyathāpi, sunakkhatta, tālo matthakacchinno abhabbo puna viruḷhiyā;
Suppose there was a palm tree with its crown cut off. It’s incapable of further growth.
evameva kho, sunakkhatta, sammā nibbānādhimuttassa purisapuggalassa ye nevasaññānāsaññāyatanasaṃyojane se ucchinnamūle tālāvatthukate anabhāvaṃkate āyatiṃ anuppādadhamme.
In the same way, an individual rightly intent on nirvana has cut off the connection with the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception at the root, made it like a palm stump, obliterated it, so it’s unable to arise in the future.
So evamassa veditabbo:
You should know of them:
‘nevasaññānāsaññāyatanasaṃyojanena hi kho visaṃyutto sammā nibbānādhimutto purisapuggalo’ti.
‘That individual is rightly intent on nirvana, for they’re detached from things connected with the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception.’
Ṭhānaṃ kho panetaṃ, sunakkhatta, vijjati yaṃ idhekaccassa bhikkhuno evamassa:
It’s possible that a certain monk might think:
‘taṇhā kho sallaṃ samaṇena vuttaṃ, avijjāvisadoso, chandarāgabyāpādena ruppati.
‘The Ascetic has said that craving is a dart; and that the poison of ignorance is inflicted by desire and ill will.
Taṃ me taṇhāsallaṃ pahīnaṃ, apanīto avijjāvisadoso, sammā nibbānādhimuttohamasmī’ti.
I have given up the dart of craving and expelled the poison of ignorance; I am rightly intent on nirvana.’
Evaṃmāni assa atathaṃ samānaṃ.
Having such conceit, though it’s not based in fact,
So yāni sammā nibbānādhimuttassa asappāyāni tāni anuyuñjeyya; asappāyaṃ cakkhunā rūpadassanaṃ anuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ sotena saddaṃ anuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ ghānena gandhaṃ anuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ jivhāya rasaṃ anuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ kāyena phoṭṭhabbaṃ anuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ manasā dhammaṃ anuyuñjeyya.
they would engage in things unconducive to nirvana: unsuitable sights, sounds, smells, tastes, touches, and thoughts.
Tassa asappāyaṃ cakkhunā rūpadassanaṃ anuyuttassa, asappāyaṃ sotena saddaṃ anuyuttassa, asappāyaṃ ghānena gandhaṃ anuyuttassa, asappāyaṃ jivhāya rasaṃ anuyuttassa, asappāyaṃ kāyena phoṭṭhabbaṃ anuyuttassa, asappāyaṃ manasā dhammaṃ anuyuttassa rāgo cittaṃ anuddhaṃseyya.
Doing so, lust infects their mind,
So rāgānuddhaṃsitena cittena maraṇaṃ vā nigaccheyya maraṇamattaṃ vā dukkhaṃ.
resulting in death or deadly pain.
Seyyathāpi, sunakkhatta, puriso sallena viddho assa savisena gāḷhūpalepanena.
Suppose a man was struck by an arrow thickly smeared with poison.
Tassa mittāmaccā ñātisālohitā bhisakkaṃ sallakattaṃ upaṭṭhāpeyyuṃ.
Their friends and colleagues, relatives and kin would get a field surgeon to treat them.
Tassa so bhisakko sallakatto satthena vaṇamukhaṃ parikanteyya.
The surgeon would cut open the wound with a scalpel,
Satthena vaṇamukhaṃ parikantitvā esaniyā sallaṃ eseyya.
probe for the arrow,
Esaniyā sallaṃ esitvā sallaṃ abbuheyya, apaneyya visadosaṃ saupādisesaṃ.
extract it, and expel the poison, leaving some residue behind.
Saupādisesoti jānamāno so evaṃ vadeyya:
Thinking that no residue remained, the surgeon would say:
‘ambho purisa, ubbhataṃ kho te sallaṃ, apanīto visadoso saupādiseso.
‘My good man, the dart has been extracted and the poison expelled without residue.
Analañca te antarāyāya.
It’s not capable of harming you.
Sappāyāni ceva bhojanāni bhuñjeyyāsi, mā te asappāyāni bhojanāni bhuñjato vaṇo assāvī assa.
Eat only suitable food. Don’t eat unsuitable food, or else the wound may get infected.
Kālena kālañca vaṇaṃ dhoveyyāsi, kālena kālaṃ vaṇamukhaṃ ālimpeyyāsi, mā te na kālena kālaṃ vaṇaṃ dhovato na kālena kālaṃ vaṇamukhaṃ ālimpato pubbalohitaṃ vaṇamukhaṃ pariyonandhi.
Regularly wash the wound and anoint the opening, or else it’ll get covered with pus and blood.
Mā ca vātātape cārittaṃ anuyuñji, mā te vātātape cārittaṃ anuyuttassa rajosūkaṃ vaṇamukhaṃ anuddhaṃsesi.
Don’t walk too much in the wind and sun, or else dust and dirt will infect the wound.
Vaṇānurakkhī ca, ambho purisa, vihareyyāsi vaṇasāropī’ti.
Take care of the wound, my good sir, heal it.’
Tassa evamassa:
They’d think:
‘ubbhataṃ kho me sallaṃ, apanīto visadoso anupādiseso.
‘The dart has been extracted and the poison expelled without residue.
Analañca me antarāyāyā’ti.
It’s not capable of harming me.’
So asappāyāni ceva bhojanāni bhuñjeyya. Tassa asappāyāni bhojanāni bhuñjato vaṇo assāvī assa.
They’d eat unsuitable food, and the wound would get infected.
Na ca kālena kālaṃ vaṇaṃ dhoveyya, na ca kālena kālaṃ vaṇamukhaṃ ālimpeyya. Tassa na kālena kālaṃ vaṇaṃ dhovato, na kālena kālaṃ vaṇamukhaṃ ālimpato pubbalohitaṃ vaṇamukhaṃ pariyonandheyya.
And they wouldn’t regularly wash and anoint the opening, so it would get covered in pus and blood.
Vātātape ca cārittaṃ anuyuñjeyya. Tassa vātātape cārittaṃ anuyuttassa rajosūkaṃ vaṇamukhaṃ anuddhaṃseyya.
And they’d walk too much in the wind and sun, so dust and dirt infected the wound.
Na ca vaṇānurakkhī vihareyya na vaṇasāropī.
And they wouldn’t take care of the wound or heal it.
Tassa imissā ca asappāyakiriyāya, asuci visadoso apanīto saupādiseso tadubhayena vaṇo puthuttaṃ gaccheyya.
Then both because they did what was unsuitable, and because of the residue of unclean poison, the wound would spread,
So puthuttaṃ gatena vaṇena maraṇaṃ vā nigaccheyya maraṇamattaṃ vā dukkhaṃ.
resulting in death or deadly pain.
Evameva kho, sunakkhatta, ṭhānametaṃ vijjati yaṃ idhekaccassa bhikkhuno evamassa:
In the same way, it’s possible that a certain monk might think:
‘taṇhā kho sallaṃ samaṇena vuttaṃ, avijjāvisadoso chandarāgabyāpādena ruppati.
‘The Ascetic has said that craving is a dart; and that the poison of ignorance is inflicted by desire and ill will.
Taṃ me taṇhāsallaṃ pahīnaṃ, apanīto avijjāvisadoso, sammā nibbānādhimuttohamasmī’ti.
I have given up the dart of craving and expelled the poison of ignorance; I am rightly intent on nirvana.’
Evaṃmāni assa atathaṃ samānaṃ.
Having such conceit, though it’s not based in fact,
So yāni sammā nibbānādhimuttassa asappāyāni tāni anuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ cakkhunā rūpadassanaṃ anuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ sotena saddaṃ anuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ ghānena gandhaṃ anuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ jivhāya rasaṃ anuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ kāyena phoṭṭhabbaṃ anuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ manasā dhammaṃ anuyuñjeyya.
they would engage in things unconducive to nirvana: unsuitable sights, sounds, smells, tastes, touches, and thoughts.
Tassa asappāyaṃ cakkhunā rūpadassanaṃ anuyuttassa, asappāyaṃ sotena saddaṃ anuyuttassa, asappāyaṃ ghānena gandhaṃ anuyuttassa, asappāyaṃ jivhāya rasaṃ anuyuttassa, asappāyaṃ kāyena phoṭṭhabbaṃ anuyuttassa, asappāyaṃ manasā dhammaṃ anuyuttassa rāgo cittaṃ anuddhaṃseyya.
Doing so, lust infects their mind,
So rāgānuddhaṃsitena cittena maraṇaṃ vā nigaccheyya maraṇamattaṃ vā dukkhaṃ.
resulting in death or deadly pain.
Maraṇañhetaṃ, sunakkhatta, ariyassa vinaye yo sikkhaṃ paccakkhāya hīnāyāvattati;
For it is death in the training of the noble one to reject the training and return to a lesser life.
maraṇamattañhetaṃ, sunakkhatta, dukkhaṃ yaṃ aññataraṃ saṅkiliṭṭhaṃ āpattiṃ āpajjati.
And it is deadly pain to commit one of the corrupt offenses.
Ṭhānaṃ kho panetaṃ, sunakkhatta, vijjati yaṃ idhekaccassa bhikkhuno evamassa:
It’s possible that a certain monk might think:
‘taṇhā kho sallaṃ samaṇena vuttaṃ, avijjāvisadoso chandarāgabyāpādena ruppati.
‘The Ascetic has said that craving is a dart; and that the poison of ignorance is inflicted by desire and ill will.
Taṃ me taṇhāsallaṃ pahīnaṃ, apanīto avijjāvisadoso, sammā nibbānādhimuttohamasmī’ti.
I have given up the dart of craving and expelled the poison of ignorance; I am rightly intent on nirvana.’
Sammā nibbānādhimuttasseva sato so yāni sammā nibbānādhimuttassa asappāyāni tāni nānuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ cakkhunā rūpadassanaṃ nānuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ sotena saddaṃ nānuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ ghānena gandhaṃ nānuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ jivhāya rasaṃ nānuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ kāyena phoṭṭhabbaṃ nānuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ manasā dhammaṃ nānuyuñjeyya.
Being rightly intent on nirvana, they wouldn’t engage in things unconducive to nirvana: unsuitable sights, sounds, smells, tastes, touches, and thoughts.
Tassa asappāyaṃ cakkhunā rūpadassanaṃ nānuyuttassa, asappāyaṃ sotena saddaṃ nānuyuttassa, asappāyaṃ ghānena gandhaṃ nānuyuttassa, asappāyaṃ jivhāya rasaṃ nānuyuttassa, asappāyaṃ kāyena phoṭṭhabbaṃ nānuyuttassa, asappāyaṃ manasā dhammaṃ nānuyuttassa rāgo cittaṃ nānuddhaṃseyya.
Doing so, lust wouldn’t infect their mind,
So na rāgānuddhaṃsitena cittena neva maraṇaṃ vā nigaccheyya na maraṇamattaṃ vā dukkhaṃ.
so no death or deadly pain would result.
Seyyathāpi, sunakkhatta, puriso sallena viddho assa savisena gāḷhūpalepanena.
Suppose a man was struck by an arrow thickly smeared with poison.
Tassa mittāmaccā ñātisālohitā bhisakkaṃ sallakattaṃ upaṭṭhāpeyyuṃ.
Their friends and colleagues, relatives and kin would get a field surgeon to treat them.
Tassa so bhisakko sallakatto satthena vaṇamukhaṃ parikanteyya.
The surgeon would cut open the wound with a scalpel,
Satthena vaṇamukhaṃ parikantitvā esaniyā sallaṃ eseyya.
probe for the arrow,
Esaniyā sallaṃ esitvā sallaṃ abbuheyya, apaneyya visadosaṃ anupādisesaṃ.
extract it, and expel the poison, leaving no residue behind.
Anupādisesoti jānamāno so evaṃ vadeyya:
Knowing that no residue remained, the surgeon would say:
‘ambho purisa, ubbhataṃ kho te sallaṃ, apanīto visadoso anupādiseso.
‘My good man, the dart has been extracted and the poison expelled without residue.
Analañca te antarāyāya.
It’s not capable of harming you.
Sappāyāni ceva bhojanāni bhuñjeyyāsi, mā te asappāyāni bhojanāni bhuñjato vaṇo assāvī assa.
Eat only suitable food. Don’t eat unsuitable food, or else the wound may get infected.
Kālena kālañca vaṇaṃ dhoveyyāsi, kālena kālaṃ vaṇamukhaṃ ālimpeyyāsi. Mā te na kālena kālaṃ vaṇaṃ dhovato na kālena kālaṃ vaṇamukhaṃ ālimpato pubbalohitaṃ vaṇamukhaṃ pariyonandhi.
Regularly wash the wound and anoint the opening, or else it’ll get covered with pus and blood.
Mā ca vātātape cārittaṃ anuyuñji, mā te vātātape cārittaṃ anuyuttassa rajosūkaṃ vaṇamukhaṃ anuddhaṃsesi.
Don’t walk too much in the wind and sun, or else dust and dirt will infect the wound.
Vaṇānurakkhī ca, ambho purisa, vihareyyāsi vaṇasāropī’ti.
Take care of the wound, my good sir, heal it.’
Tassa evamassa:
They’d think:
‘ubbhataṃ kho me sallaṃ, apanīto visadoso anupādiseso.
‘The dart has been extracted and the poison expelled without residue.
Analañca me antarāyāyā’ti.
It’s not capable of harming me.’
So sappāyāni ceva bhojanāni bhuñjeyya. Tassa sappāyāni bhojanāni bhuñjato vaṇo na assāvī assa.
They’d eat suitable food, and the wound wouldn’t get infected.
Kālena kālañca vaṇaṃ dhoveyya, kālena kālaṃ vaṇamukhaṃ ālimpeyya. Tassa kālena kālaṃ vaṇaṃ dhovato kālena kālaṃ vaṇamukhaṃ ālimpato na pubbalohitaṃ vaṇamukhaṃ pariyonandheyya.
And they’d regularly wash and anoint the opening, so it wouldn’t get covered in pus and blood.
Na ca vātātape cārittaṃ anuyuñjeyya. Tassa vātātape cārittaṃ ananuyuttassa rajosūkaṃ vaṇamukhaṃ nānuddhaṃseyya.
And they wouldn’t walk too much in the wind and sun, so dust and dirt wouldn’t infect the wound.
Vaṇānurakkhī ca vihareyya vaṇasāropī.
And they’d take care of the wound and heal it.
Tassa imissā ca sappāyakiriyāya asu ca visadoso apanīto anupādiseso tadubhayena vaṇo viruheyya.
Then both because they did what was suitable, and the unclean poison had left no residue, the wound would heal,
So ruḷhena vaṇena sañchavinā neva maraṇaṃ vā nigaccheyya na maraṇamattaṃ vā dukkhaṃ.
and no death or deadly pain would result.
Evameva kho, sunakkhatta, ṭhānametaṃ vijjati yaṃ idhekaccassa bhikkhuno evamassa:
In the same way, it’s possible that a certain monk might think:
‘taṇhā kho sallaṃ samaṇena vuttaṃ, avijjāvisadoso chandarāgabyāpādena ruppati.
‘The Ascetic has said that craving is a dart; and that the poison of ignorance is inflicted by desire and ill will.
Taṃ me taṇhāsallaṃ pahīnaṃ, apanīto avijjāvisadoso, sammā nibbānādhimuttohamasmī’ti.
I have given up the dart of craving and expelled the poison of ignorance; I am rightly intent on nirvana.’
Sammā nibbānādhimuttasseva sato so yāni sammā nibbānādhimuttassa asappāyāni tāni nānuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ cakkhunā rūpadassanaṃ nānuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ sotena saddaṃ nānuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ ghānena gandhaṃ nānuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ jivhāya rasaṃ nānuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ kāyena phoṭṭhabbaṃ nānuyuñjeyya, asappāyaṃ manasā dhammaṃ nānuyuñjeyya.
Being rightly intent on nirvana, they wouldn’t engage in things unconducive to nirvana: unsuitable sights, sounds, smells, tastes, touches, and thoughts.
Tassa asappāyaṃ cakkhunā rūpadassanaṃ nānuyuttassa, asappāyaṃ sotena saddaṃ nānuyuttassa, asappāyaṃ ghānena gandhaṃ nānuyuttassa, asappāyaṃ jivhāya rasaṃ nānuyuttassa, asappāyaṃ kāyena phoṭṭhabbaṃ nānuyuttassa, asappāyaṃ manasā dhammaṃ nānuyuttassa, rāgo cittaṃ nānuddhaṃseyya.
Doing so, lust wouldn’t infect their mind,
So na rāgānuddhaṃsitena cittena neva maraṇaṃ vā nigaccheyya na maraṇamattaṃ vā dukkhaṃ.
so no death or deadly pain would result.
Upamā kho me ayaṃ, sunakkhatta, katā atthassa viññāpanāya.
I’ve made up this simile to make a point.
Ayaṃyevettha attho—
And this is the point:
vaṇoti kho, sunakkhatta, channetaṃ ajjhattikānaṃ āyatanānaṃ adhivacanaṃ;
‘Wound’ is a term for the six interior sense fields.
visadosoti kho, sunakkhatta, avijjāyetaṃ adhivacanaṃ;
‘Poison’ is a term for ignorance.
sallanti kho, sunakkhatta, taṇhāyetaṃ adhivacanaṃ;
‘Dart’ is a term for craving.
esanīti kho, sunakkhatta, satiyāyetaṃ adhivacanaṃ;
‘Probing’ is a term for remembering.
satthanti kho, sunakkhatta, ariyāyetaṃ paññāya adhivacanaṃ;
‘Scalpel’ is a term for noble wisdom.
bhisakko sallakattoti kho, sunakkhatta, tathāgatassetaṃ adhivacanaṃ arahato sammāsambuddhassa.
‘Field surgeon’ is a term for the Realized One, the perfected one, the fully awakened Buddha.
So vata, sunakkhatta, bhikkhu chasu phassāyatanesu saṃvutakārī ‘upadhi dukkhassa mūlan’ti—
Truly, Sunakkhatta, that monk practices restraint regarding the six fields of contact.
iti viditvā nirupadhi upadhisaṅkhaye vimutto upadhismiṃ vā kāyaṃ upasaṃharissati cittaṃ vā uppādessatīti—netaṃ ṭhānaṃ vijjati.
Understanding that attachment is the root of suffering, they are freed with the ending of attachments. It’s not possible that they would apply their body or interest their mind in any attachment.
Seyyathāpi, sunakkhatta, āpānīyakaṃso vaṇṇasampanno gandhasampanno rasasampanno;
Suppose there was a bronze cup of beverage that had a nice color, aroma, and flavor.
so ca kho visena saṃsaṭṭho.
But it was mixed with poison.
Atha puriso āgaccheyya jīvitukāmo amaritukāmo sukhakāmo dukkhapaṭikūlo.
Then a person would come along who wants to live and doesn’t want to die, who wants to be happy and recoils from pain.
Taṃ kiṃ maññasi, sunakkhatta,
What do you think, Sunakkhatta?
api nu so puriso amuṃ āpānīyakaṃsaṃ piveyya yaṃ jaññā:
Would that person drink that beverage knowing that
‘imāhaṃ pivitvā maraṇaṃ vā nigacchāmi maraṇamattaṃ vā dukkhan’”ti?
it would result in death or deadly suffering?”
“No hetaṃ, bhante”.
“No, sir.”
“Evameva kho, sunakkhatta, so vata bhikkhu chasu phassāyatanesu saṃvutakārī ‘upadhi dukkhassa mūlan’ti—
“In the same way, Sunakkhatta, that monk practices restraint regarding the six fields of contact.
iti viditvā nirupadhi upadhisaṅkhaye vimutto upadhismiṃ vā kāyaṃ upasaṃharissati cittaṃ vā uppādessatīti—netaṃ ṭhānaṃ vijjati.
Understanding that attachment is the root of suffering, they are freed with the ending of attachments. It’s not possible that they would apply their body or interest their mind in any attachment.
Seyyathāpi, sunakkhatta, āsīviso ghoraviso.
Suppose there was a lethal viper.
Atha puriso āgaccheyya jīvitukāmo amaritukāmo sukhakāmo dukkhapaṭikūlo.
Then a person would come along who wants to live and doesn’t want to die, who wants to be happy and recoils from pain.
Taṃ kiṃ maññasi, sunakkhatta,
What do you think, Sunakkhatta?
api nu so puriso amussa āsīvisassa ghoravisassa hatthaṃ vā aṅguṭṭhaṃ vā dajjā yaṃ jaññā:
Would that person give that lethal viper their hand or finger knowing that
‘imināhaṃ daṭṭho maraṇaṃ vā nigacchāmi maraṇamattaṃ vā dukkhan’”ti?
it would result in death or deadly suffering?”
“No hetaṃ, bhante”.
“No, sir.”
“Evameva kho, sunakkhatta, so vata bhikkhu chasu phassāyatanesu saṃvutakārī ‘upadhi dukkhassa mūlan’ti—
“In the same way, Sunakkhatta, that monk practices restraint regarding the six fields of contact.
iti viditvā nirupadhi upadhisaṅkhaye vimutto upadhismiṃ vā kāyaṃ upasaṃharissati cittaṃ vā uppādessatīti—
Understanding that attachment is the root of suffering, they are freed with the ending of attachments. It’s not possible that they would apply their body or interest their mind in any attachment.”
netaṃ ṭhānaṃ vijjatī”ti.
Idamavoca bhagavā.
That is what the Buddha said.
Attamano sunakkhatto licchaviputto bhagavato bhāsitaṃ abhinandīti.
Satisfied, Sunakkhatta of the Licchavi clan was happy with what the Buddha said.


☸ Lucid 24.org 🐘🐾‍